In general, the 70-300mm ƒ/4-5.6 offers above-average results for sharpness; when stopped down, and kept below 200mm, results are excellent. The sharpest focal length / aperture setting on our sample was 70mm at ƒ/11, where the image was almost tack-sharp across the entire frame.
Also, Is Tamron 70 300 A good lens?
For its low price, the Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Lens delivers rather impressive overall image quality. … Stopping down at 300mm helps, but even f/11 image quality is only marginal. If you consider this a 70-200mm lens, you will be more happy than if you are counting on getting great 300mm image quality.
Beside above Which is better Tamron or Sigma? Sigma lenses are more expensive, they are better built and they are overall superior to Tamron in how the “sports” or “Art” lenses (as Tamron’s SP (Special Performance) designations), but anyway, Tamron has better electronics, has sharper zooms and no way water or dust can enter in a lens unless you pour it yourself in …
What is the 70-300mm lens good for?
The AF Zoom-NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4-5.6G is a lightweight and versatile option for those seeking affordable telephoto zoom capability. With a 300mm maximum focal length (450mm equivalent on DX-format cameras) it brings even the most distant action closer. It’s an ideal lens for candids, travel and sports photography.
Is Sigma a good lens brand?
Sigma has long been a favorite third-party lens company for combining high quality and low price. Whether you shoot Canon, Nikon, Sony, or an L-Mount camera from Leica, Panasonic, or Sigma, Sigma a number of lenses to choose from.
Which is better Sigma or Tamron 70 300mm lens?
The Sigma has an MM of 1:4 or 0.25X. The most recently introduced Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 (A005) has an MM of 1:3.9 or 0.26X. It’s more expensive but also gives better image quality. So in terms of macro capability there’s little difference at all between the two currently manufactured lenses.
Are Tamron lenses good quality?
The Tamron SP 150-600mm delivers excellent sharpness in the centre with good value and build quality, as well as fast AF. CA is extremely low, so is distortion and the lens is very resistant to flare. Available for Canon EF, Nikon F, and Sony A mount.
Which is better Sigma or Tamron 70-300mm lens?
The Sigma has an MM of 1:4 or 0.25X. The most recently introduced Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 (A005) has an MM of 1:3.9 or 0.26X. It’s more expensive but also gives better image quality. So in terms of macro capability there’s little difference at all between the two currently manufactured lenses.
Is 70-300mm good for portraits?
A 70-300mm zoom lens is OK for portraits, but not ideal. Conventional wisdom is that the ideal focal length for portraits is about 85mm, and this is why manufacturers like Nikon, Sony, Samyang, Canon and others, all make 85mm prime lenses, specifically for shooting portraits.
Is a 300mm lens good for wildlife?
The best lenses to capture wildlife action also cover a lot of range. … It’s hard to get close to most wild subjects, so wildlife photographers generally use long lenses: at least 300mm for an APS-C DSLR, or 400mm for a full-frame DSLR or 35mm SLR. If you can get fairly close to larger animals, a 70-200mm zoom can work.
Is Sigma better than Nikon?
Sigma’s new Art series lenses are worth buying over nikon because they give you better detail, colors and more crisp image quality than Nikon. Moreover, Sigma lenses are cheaper as compared to nikon or canon lenses.
Why is Sigma lens so expensive?
The technology of the optics is superior and for its size very light weight but the construction uses a lot of plastic. Expensive lenses are expensive because they are well constructed, made to last professional use for years, and deliver the very best optically.
What is the difference between 55 300 and 70-300 lens?
Image quality is the same with both and the 70-300 VR focuses faster. The 55-300 VR is significantly smaller and lighter.
Is the Tamron AF 70-300mm?
One of Tamron’s Digitally Integrated (Di) lenses, the AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro is designed for use on both full-frame and APS-C-sized cameras. … It’s a feature that’s quite uncommon on telephoto zoom lenses but is shared by the Sigma 70-300mm APO Macro lens.
Is Tamron better than Nikkor?
In terms of price, the Tamron wins handily. With an MSRP of $599, it’s a good deal less expensive than the Nikon (MSRP $950). That’s not an inconsequential difference, and for some shooters, that might well be a deciding factor.
Is Tamron better than Canon?
Some Tamron lenses are better than some Nikon and Canon, some are worse. If you’re buying the best lens in any category, the Nikon and Canon will almost certainly be better than the Tamron. If you’re paying the same amount in any category, there’s a pretty good chance that the Tamron lens is the better.
What is the sharpest Tamron lens?
Best Super Telephoto Tamron Lens: Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD. Best Tamron Lens for Telephoto Photography: Tamron SP 180mm f/3.5 Di LD 1:1 Macro. Best Lens for Wide-Angle Photography: Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical [IF]
Is Tamron a good lens brand?
Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD Review
The Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD lens delivers exceptional image quality at a reasonable price, making it a better buy than first-party options.
Are Sigma lenses any good?
Some Sigma lenses are excellent, and priced fairly well for what they are. Some are horrible but don’t cost much. Most of the ones in the middle are okay, and are a good value for the low cost, but some of their mid range lenses are still poor. Their EX series are generally decent performers.
Do you need a 70-300mm lens?
Most amateurs do not need such a lens, but professional ones do. … There is an advantage in using the 70 to 300mm lenses as they offer versatility. Such a lens can be used for daylight telephoto subjects including wildlife, travel, candid and portrait shots due to its wide range of focal length.
Which Nikon 300mm lens is best?
Best Nikon telephoto lenses in 2021
- Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR. …
- Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD. …
- Sigma 70-200mm f2. …
- Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD. …
- Nikon 120-300mm f/2.8E AF-S FL ED SR VR. …
- Tamron 100-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di VC USD. …
- Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C. …
- Nikon AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR.
Is Nikon 70 300 VR worth it?
This 70-300mm VR is the very best modern tele zoom lens to get if you prefer a dedicated tele zoom over a do-it-all zoom and want light weight and moderate price. It’s a nice semi-plasticy amateur lens with a metal mount. If you need tougher, spend twice as much on the fully professional 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-D for $1,100.
Is a 75 300mm lens good for wildlife?
A fast telephoto zoom lens can make it possible to get action shots like this when you’re in the right location. … For this shot of a leopard in a tree, a 75–300mm lens used at 300mm on a M4/3 camera provided the equivalent of a 600mm lens on a 35mm camera.
How far can 300mm lens reach?
The 200 or 300mm lenses the pro use are typically f/2 or f/2.8, and cost as much as a decent used car. Those lenses will blur even a close background. Anything from 7 feet to infinity. Depending on minimum focusing distance of your lens.
What’s the best zoom lens for wildlife?
The best lens choices for wildlife photography
- Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 II (£1,820 // $2,000) …
- Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6 (£1,150 // $1,400) …
- Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 (£800 // $1,000) …
- Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 G2 (£1,300 // $1,400) …
- Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 (£1,750 // $2,100) …
- Nikon 300mm f/2.8 (£4,800 // $5,500)
Discussion about this post